Skip to content | Accessibility | Contacting or visiting us

Get the best from your NHS

Press release - 30 September 2002

Joint Statement on The Future of Breast Care Services by Mid Sussex PCT and NHS Brighton and Hove

On Friday 27 September 2002 our two organisations agreed that the best way to ensure quality breast care services for our patient population of 500,000 was to establish a new unit on the Rosaz House site at the Royal Sussex County Hospital (RSCH) in Brighton. This new unit will work alongside the existing breast care unit at the Princess Royal Hospital (PRH) in Haywards Heath.

Both organisations agreed that the current situation was not providing the best for patients. The Breast Assessment Centre and the Nigel Porter Unit at the RSCH are overcrowded and inadequate, while the workload of the Mid Sussex unit is lower than national guidelines and therefore the unit is at risk of losing official accreditation.

We are committed to the principle that our organisations must plan integrated services across two sites - the RSCH and the PRH. It is essential that the decision is seen in this wider context.

Both organisations came to this conclusion for a number of reasons, including:

  • This issue had already been given detailed consideration over a long period of time and it was imperative that a decision was reached to ensure the best quality of care. Further delay in relation to a decision that was first discussed in November 2001 would have been disadvantageous to patients.
  • A site on Rosaz House would ensure close physical links with the first class cancer centre already at the RSCH.
  • This was the best option for Mid Sussex PCT from a financial point of view, costing at least 250,000 a year less in running costs than the Princess Royal based options.
  • Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust were in favour of the Rosaz site option.
  • The Rosaz House site would provide greater access to more patients.
  • The Brighton, Hove and Lewes Community Health Council had made it clear that if the decision was to create a single breast care unit at PRH it would exercise its right to refer the decision to the Secretary of State for Health as a major reorganisation of services.

There are no losers in this scenario. The PRH breast care service now has a secure future. The viability of the hospital is not affected by this decision.

On the contrary, we are very keen to pursue discussions about the potential for siting a new diagnostic and treatment centre at the PRH.

We all agree that the best way to save more lives is to raise the profile of breast screening and emphasise its importance in ensuring early detection of breast cancer.

Both organisations need to work closely to provide better services for the people in the area. It is no longer an option for either community to work in isolation.

We look forward to continuing to work together in the future.